Home  Physics papers  Science books  Scientific information  Middle School Physics  Science books  Forum[Comments Messages]
  Current location : Physics version > Physics papers > Principal papers > Text
  Abstract physics papers
Excellent links
Chinese text        Previous:Gravitational nature of the campaign and said the new source "of thin air of" View of Nature
    Next:Correcting the special theory of relativity wrong target=_blank title="A detailed understanding of the author">Author information
Correcting the special theory of relativity wrong
  

    Abstract  Einstein deduced Lorentz Transformation (special relativity the key formula), the use of a coordinate system; Between the two systems and the relative speed, he wrongly believed that common, which produced twins fallacy. The correct method is derived: 1, still with einstein the public Set premise; 2, the use of the correct mathematical logic, coordinates is clear that the relative velocity measurement system, not arbitrary switching; 3, physical sense, to be hidden within the dominant factor and the expense of two geometric factor Nian .

    Keywords  specialrelativity,Lorentzconversionformula,Twinfalsehoods,hiddeninternalenergyfactor,dominantgeometricfacto

Einstein used purely mathematical methods, Lorentz formula has been derived, and to explain to the physics. Later called the "special theory of relativity", which released the results at the same time his formula has shown the fallacy: he measured in the speed of a system, as there are two systems. Leads the famous "twins fallacy", it's the love of lifelong regret. After his death, generation after generation of scientists have not solved it, exactly 100 years, this is the sad history of science,

This先讲"special relativity" errors under, and then use scientific methods introduced correct results.

Einstein's special relativity is derived two public:

1, the speed of light in all inertial systems are the same;

2, physics theorem in all inertial systems are the same.

Under this two public, the special theory of relativity has drawn such a conclusion:

"Comparing the two mobile systems are the same, and using a reference system that can be." So that is derived as follows:

The relative movement of two systems: K and k (k K system of measuring the movement speed of U). K lines in the people, their own system static, k lines in Mobile; Conversely, in the Department of Human k, k system static. K in Mobile, so using "common sense" Derivation: K People, in the movement of the k, k of a slow time (in K because it is the relative velocity measurement system U, known pushing); The Department of Human and k, K in the campaign, K of the slow time (known Backstepping).

The original author of the pushing and pushing against the mathematical processing, equate, derived purely relative error.

This is the scientific history of the famous twins fallacy:

There are A, B or two twin brother, a ride rocket travel, the Rockets close to the speed of light. When a return from space, according to "rocket perspective, Earth in Motion (Inversion)." A look at the young B variable; Yet, according to the "global perspective, the Rockets Movement (pushing)." B of A variable younger.

This is the fallacy of special relativity.

I ride the spacecraft to leave the Earth and return to Earth experience, speed up, slow down, turn around, and other conditions; While the B (Earth) system is not accelerating. The system has not accelerated the timing would have accelerated over time into the system slow, so they conclude that the special theory of relativity fallacy resolved.

甲与乙different experience so why not in the formula in the special theory of relativity show? I think that first of all the mathematical logic of the special theory of relativity is wrong; Another mistake is: it did not have pointed to the acceleration of the system, there are relatively potential. Please read the following inferences:

The special theory of relativity that: K lines in the measurement of speed in the U k left movement, in turn, said:

K looks into the system in the K system to speed U k system relative to movement.

The correct statement is: K system in the measurement of speed in the U k left movement, contrary (Inversion): looks into the system in k, K system in accordance with the measurement speed U, k system relative to K system right movement.

So, pushing and pushing inverse relationship clear, the relationship between the relative blunt disappeared, absolute speed of the establishment.

Following cite three examples to illustrate.

The first example is the direct substitution mistake: the special theory of relativity come from pushing method, measurement systems from K k system of the time and distance formula (also known as the Lorentz transformation):

T = (t + U x / C ) / -----------------------------( 1)

X = (x-U t) / --------------------------------( 2)

Where: T, X, U K system in the measurement of time, distance, speed;

T, x k system for the time, distance; W = 1 - (U / C)

The special theory of relativity by (1) (2) - in self-substitution, the use of simple calculation can be drawn immediately:

T = (T + UX / C ) / -------------------------( 3)

X = (X - UT) / ------------------------------( 4)

Therefore, the special theory of relativity concluded: "From K system of k, k system with the view from the K system exactly the same, both are relative"

In fact, their mistakes can immediately pointed out that:-the above four, the U has become a constant, K lines in the measurement of U, mistakenly believe that the system of measurement k u.

The second example is the geometric textbooks commonly used is derived.

The perpendicular to the relative velocity of light in the relative motion of two relationships in the system in figure 1.

Figure 1.

Look at the Left:

K system to speed U K system relative to campaign, when measured in K k in the system

Upper and lower vibration of light a b c, mapping into their own systems, with a triangle ABC,

L, L, UT and the high component of the relationship:

L = D + (0.5 * UT)

Because of the speed of light unchanged: T = 2L / C; Because D = d (upper and lower mobile unchanged); And t = 2d / C

Substitution: (0.5 * CT) = (0.5 Ct) + (0.5 * UT) -----------( 5)

A: T = T + (UT / C)

After including the shift of T: a: T = t / ------------------( 6)

再推in: X = x / -------------------( 7)

(6) (7) - is (1) (2) of part is correct. However; Anti-computing (Inversion), the special theory of relativity from the K again in the U measurement system, equivalent to the measurement system in k u, income generation, with the same method of derivation: l = D + (0.5 * u t)

Next only to the pushdown T into t, and t changed T:

(0.5 * Ct) = (0.5 * CT) + (0.5 * Ut) ---------------------( 8)

Second-in the following: t = T / X = X /

This is a mistake, because it led to a completely relative.

Now with this idea to put things right: "For k system, which is still used in the measurement system in the K-speed U K system relative to movement." The result was derived changed.

A right viewing drawings: All State and left with only light in the K system for upper and lower vibration, in the K-system observers see the light in their own k triangle system was a b c, k in the system of observers of the system together with the movement (U K in the system of measurement ), so:

T = 0.5 * l / c = C a UT

Observers K system together with the k Movement system, so: d = Ct

Substitution: l = D + (0.5 * UT)

(0.5 * CT) = (0.5 * c t) + (0.5 * UT) (Contrast (8) -)

Shift in: (C t) = (CT) -- (UT) --------------------( 9)

T = T * -------------------------------( 10)

Empathy in: x = X * ----------------------------( 11)

Such an outcome, in line with practice results twins fallacy eliminated.

The third example, to be determined by the coefficient method derived Luo Have transform.

In accordance with the views of special relativity are Type:

X + (CT) = X + (Ct) -------------( 12)

By using X = UT (correct), the start, collating, and it is that Luo Transform (1) and (2) Type.

Conversely, backstepping, the special theory of relativity using x = Ut into the (12) -之左, can be derived with the same methods the Lorentz transformation (3) and (4) type. This step wrong, because the U K system is measured, not into the k system.

The correct method is deduced:

In this proposition are two kinds of different physical relations: The first is the internal energy changes as speed is absolute, the absolute speed of a system that must have greater internal energy; Small absolute speed of a system that should be able within smaller. To that end with plans for the auxiliary inferences:

Photo 2

There are two systems of K and k, K system relatively static, k systems for U K system to speed along the axis-right movement, when the coordinates of two overlapping, Y and y coincidence in origin. Ray also have a right movement, the T-seconds later, K S system arrived at the light, the light reaching k s system, not because of the speed of light early speed, two light system in two equal speed, S and s on the map should be equal.

Light to wave movement, optical-frequency vibration direction and the vertical direction of the campaign, that is to say: with the direction of the optical vertical bright own, the frequency of vibration of energy, so Figure 2 and Figure 1 the same phenomenon of the different painting. Figure 1 is that the frequency of vibration. Figure 1 is first pushed by the (5) - with the correct Backstepping (9) -, available:

(CT) -- (UT) = (C t) ------------( 13)

T = ------------------------------( 6)

The system equal to the speed of light, so:

X = ---------------------------- (7)

Because pushing and pushing inverse have been the same formula (13), so:

T = T * ----------------------------( 10)

X = X * ---------------------------( 11)

Formula (6), (7), (9), (10): used for information and a system that is not the same.

Based on the above derivation of the optical system between the different frequency or wavelength; The energy equivalent to the optical frequency x-Planck constant, so the formula directly within the system that can change.

If there are in the system of movement, also another physical relationship, that is the dominant geometric relations.

From (3) - in: X = x / + - UT

Right anterior - is a "will" in nature, the latter is the "objects" with the movement changes the distance.

T = t / Substitution

X = -----------------------------------( 2)

Inverse operation:

X = X * + - T = X * U + - U * (T * )

X = (X - + U * T) * ----------------( 14)

The time change: In addition to the internal energy system changes, there are two dominant belonging to the geometric:

1, the relative movement will be divided by the speed of light from the (X / C), is the length of (or movement distance), "Light consumption" (time) factor.

2, relative velocity divided by the speed of light (U / C), the two systems is the ratio of time substitution, in the K X is the distance of time consumption, the system was mapped to the k x later consumption difference how many times?

3. Two multiplication factor (U / C) * (X / C), K system is defined by the distance measured at X consumption, reflected in the proceeds k system when consumption. :

T = t / + - (U / C) * (X / C)

X = x / Substitution

T = (t +-U * x / C ) / ----------------------------------( 1)

Inverse transform t = T * + - ((U / c) * T / c)

T = (T +-UX / C ) * ----------------------------------( 15)

Twin Paradox errors disappear.

(1) (2) special theory of relativity is correct-the original-two (14) (15) - the original - is the special theory of relativity (3) (4) corrective, a correct style, in a relativistic absolute meaning.

Discussion:

1, over the past 100 years, the practice of special relativity, mainly in the high-speed on Earth particles on the microstructure and experimental measurements, the measurement process in the whole Earth system, in line with the special theory of relativity "pushing" is correct. If this theory by amending the original theory, the original correct or correct, the original ambiguous, it correct.

2, "the dominant geometric relations," and "hidden energy relations," the formation of a formula. Such models are also some practice, the frequency of displacement confirmed equation is one of them:

V =

Where: V = original frequency; V = measured frequency; U = relative velocity; C = the speed of light; $ = U observation direction and the direction angle.

Equation right: molecular relativistic is hidden in the "energy factor" (non-directional); The denominator is the dominant of geometric relations.

3 This is the key to (13) of the list, need to repeat this: one is the theory and practice of the past century should consider resolving fallacy; On the other hand, Lorentz transformation requires a square containing a mathematical factor. Original Einstein's math vertical, directly introduced square (that is, in three cases of the formula (12)), he does not give the significance of this relationship square; In modern textbooks, only saying that is: take into account expansion of the secondary side, the purely mathematical treatment. This article confirms it is the internal energy physics, said that the high-speed movement of the relations between the purely relative to the absolute relative.

4, the spacecraft and the Earth relative movement, the spacecraft is a closed system. Judge rockets and spacecraft relative motion, because they are the measuring system on the planet (or universe), so the calculation of rockets and spacecraft relative, the need to Earth or universe measurement system introduced.

5, the original formula of special relativity that the quality (M = M0 / ), And the resulting quality can be introduced equation (E = M C ), The physical meaning of ambiguous because these are hidden in a formula that fallacy: If K k Observation System of Systems Quality increased, leading to an increase in energy; Conversely, from the k system, the system of K increase the quality, can also result in an increase. This is contradictory.

If used with the views of this paper, the high speed of the system of the quality increase, which will also increase; Speed small system, relatively unchanged. This fallacy disappeared, and the quality of that relationship are saved eternal law.

[References]

[1] Peng Huanwu, and Xu Xian China. Theoretical Physics basis. Beijing: Beijing University Press, 1998.

[2] Guangzheng Ni-chung,李洪芳. Modern Physics. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Publishing House, 1979.

[Author brief] Mi-Jiang, male, Han nationality, Shanghai, the mouth of Shengli Oilfield geological oil production by the computer senior engineer, graduated from Northwestern University in the early years of petroleum geology profession after graduation, in the Northwest Petroleum Council, the Yumen oil fields, Shengli Oilfield, and other units engaged in oil exploration and development , computer software and so on.

Contact: Shengli Oilfield geological oil production by the estuary, Dongying, Shandong 257200 author Email: mihaijiang2004 # 163.com (Please "#" to "@")


    Previous:Uncertainty relations compatible with the classical laws of motion of scientific significance
    Next:On generalized relative temperature difference gravitational field theory
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Print  Close  Reproduction recommended  Local collections    Yahoo collections   
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Recent comments
  Netizen comments[Readme]0   => View comments  

Anonymous  
 
=> Pictures Data => RELATED LINKS => Scientific papers
Site MapAbout UscontributePhysicalSocialSiteToolSearch
Copyright©:Searcher Network Magazine Papers quoted information, please reference Welcome contributions! Thanks for the support!