Abstract  Based on the analysis of some experiments, discussed the existence of special relativity experimental basis.

    Keywords  Lorentz，transformation，and，the，theory，of，relativity,，time，expansion

CLC: 042.1 literature table insight code: A

Special relativity come out for some 100 years, the experiment is based on the special theory of relativity? There are no special relativity experimental basis? These issues are not always very clear picture of them. Some physicists believe that "people have been continuing to apply new methods and experimental measurement techniques were observed for this theory (referring to the special theory of relativity) provided a wealth of experimental evidence [1]," and the so-called able to confirm the correctness of special relativity experiments are like familiar cited it again: Michelson - Morey-type experiments, experimental atomic clock global navigation, flight meson extend the life span .... These experiments can be used to confirm that the special theory of relativity? These experiments is described what? This weighing the merits careful.

A Brief Introduction to the expansion is absolute and relative

To explain Michelson - Morey's zero-experimental results, in the Lorentz proposed expansion campaign inertial system within the time and space contraction hypothesis. Ethernet Lorentz think there is, time will only occur in the expansion of Ethernet movement relative to the bell, which will not happen in the geostationary bell on the Ethernet.

Assumptions Ethernet is still in the excellent reference system, Ethernet is relative to the reference system Movement, a two incidents was the time lag Within 10 minutes of the recorded as geostationary By Within 10 minutes of the recorded as geostationary Under the Lorentz transformation can be obtained - And The relationship between:

(1)

Because By Within 10 minutes of the recorded static, in terms of this clearly has a bell Therefore, And The relationship between the more simply expressed as:

(2)

Lorentz use Ethernet to (1) - into (2) -, and many high precision experiments have proved (2) - is correct. In the hypothesis of Lorentz Ethernet movement relative to the 10-minute "really" go slow, Lorentz expansive effect on the time given absolute.

The special theory of relativity, Einstein, the Lorentz transformation in the physical meaning of re-explained. Einstein considered superior reference system simply does not exist, if there are two relative motion of inertial system And , And The observers can think of themselves as the other party is still the sport, can be that the other side's bell has time expansion, namely the time expansion is relative.

Lorentz completed rely on Ethernet (1) - to (2) of the conversion of the special theory of relativity, Einstein is how this can be achieved? To make To eliminate (1) where the latter, Einstein clearly pointed out that in the course of inertial system measurement Countless must be placed within 10 minutes, using this with the numerous bell A fixed within the Department of the bell than Department observers will find that the Within 10 minutes of slow, and vice versa [3]. Einstein completed this manner (1) to (2) of the conversion. According to Einstein's view, observed that the expansion effect must have two prerequisites: First, there must be two inertial system relative movement; Second, the measurement of observer must use their own reference system in numerous bell and another with their relative movement of inertial system within a fixed compared to 10 minutes , found that the other party will take 10 minutes slower. Without these two conditions is impossible observed that the expansion. In special relativity does not mean that the expansion in time bell "true" go slow, the expansion is in the process of measuring the [2] [4].

The expansion is explained physics circles have always existence of two diametrically opposed views: Lorentz think it is absolutely time of expansion, and expansion of Einstein considered that the time is relative. As explained in a series of Ethernet physical encounter in the course of the experiment trouble, Lorentz hypothesis倍受冷落, and the special theory of relativity, are sought after. Whether pursued by the special theory of relativity, after the test of practice and whether they can stand the test of practice, which is to be discussed by this paper, following the content.

Second, the special theory of relativity whether experimental basis?

The certification is a series of special relativity experiments for analysis. Verification time expanding the trial is the most classic sports muon observed changes in the half-life [1]. Some physicists in cosmic rays seen in relation to the Earth's speed of movement to 0.995 c muon the extended half-life, so that the special theory of relativity predicted by the time the expansion was certified. In fact, this is at best experimental confirmed on Earth in geostationary Earth's fastest 10 minutes gone, the bell relative to the greater speed of the Earth's movement taking more slowly, and this time not the slightest expansion also shows a relative. Observers also did not stand in a 0.995 c to the inertial system on the high-speed operation, did not campaign in this high-speed in the inertial system in the same see geostationary Earth muon also extended half-life circumstances, how can we say that this experiment confirms the correctness of the theory of relativity?

Used to verify the theory of relativity is another very famous experiment Hafele and Keating in 1971 to do [1]. Hafele and Keating were the cesium atomic clock on the ground and in flight, said aircraft eastward week to return to orbit the earth in the ground, aircraft cesium atomic clock on the ground than the slower, and the aircraft westward week to return to orbit the earth ground, the plane cesium atomic clock faster than the ground, the final conclusion is in error within the scope of experiments The results consistent with the theory of relativity predicted [1]. Both Hafele or applaud for Hafele experimental physicist, did not appear to have found this experiment completely violated the special theory of relativity:一, Hafele did not use their own reference system within 10 minutes and countless relative to their own campaigns another within a fixed reference system compared to the bell, from the completion of this experiment how (1) of the (2) change of the work? I did not make this Hafele accountable for this experimental physicist is not a good thing to explain. Second, Hafele in the geostationary Earth's bell and has been compared to the Earth's movement on the bell in the same inertial system comparison, which shows that he is not in the two reference system relative movement of the observation time on expansion effect, and according to expansion of the special theory of relativity time is relative, in the measurement process occurred, it has not, in two inertial system relative movement of the expansion would not have time to effect. But Hafele has claimed that he not only observed in experiments to this effect, but also received the results predicted by the theory of relativity, This is a strange.

Hafele experiment is indeed true, then it must be the result aroused great attention. Because of this experiment has at least note the following points:

1. Hafele found Geocentric coordinates relative to the movement of the 10-minute walk slowly, still in the bell geocentric coordinate system faster pace, which has been clearly proved that the expansion of absolute time and thus the results of experiments with the special theory of relativity conclusions to the contrary.

2. Hafel not in their own reference system set up within 10 minutes countless reference nor in the two no relative movement of circumstances observed time expansion effect, we can see that there is no need time expansion effect Einstein proposed by the prerequisite.

3. In accordance with the special theory of relativity time expansion is not related to the internal atomic some mysterious process, the measurement is in the process of [2], Hafele no movement in the 10-minute period for any measurement, only the bell to stop the campaign after campaign, Hafele readings from the bell bell found in the "Movement" ( here referring to the campaign Geocentric coordinates relative to the Movement) period really go slow, and this is precisely the internal atomic clock in the campaign Games cyclical slow (because Hafele use the cesium atomic clock).

Hafele to the special theory of relativity to the test the correctness of the time of a big question mark. One seems to have rejected the theory of relativity was the experiment as evidence that the validity of the theory of relativity to playing with such strange things in the study of relativity frequently arise. Some physicists conclusions of the theory of relativity in the use of time have often overlooked the premise of this conclusion, but not these preconditions will never have it all relativistic after the conclusion of the violation of the basic tenets of the theory of relativity experiments to confirm the theory of relativity that some people seem to have become common. The reason why physics community, many people believe that the theory of relativity has been confirmed by experiments, because they mistakenly found time to the expansion effect of special relativity experiments as all experimental basis. They did not seem to understand that by the time inflation is the Lorentz, Lorentz and Einstein's differences is that the former believe that the expansion of the latter has the absolute time that a relative of the expansion, only time and expansive effect of this effect could not confirm all of relativity experiments is not used to prove that the theory of relativity is correct; It seems that they do not understand, experiment only in full compliance with Einstein proposed by the two prerequisites, which can be expanded to show that the relative nature of time, currently available in the literature can no experiments with Einstein at the request made by these experiments Filling its time of expansion can only be able to confirm that there is and has absolute, simply out to show that what correctness of the theory of relativity.

Due to space limitations, the author is unable to experiment in all this enumerating. Renowned physicist Contreras (W. Kantor) used in the analysis of the theory of relativity confirmed after more than 60 experiments that: these experiments are based on the logic of invalid or wrong way. Through the above discussion, the author also found that the special theory of relativity there is no experimental basis.

Third, acceleration can not be explained by the special theory of relativity in doubt

Experimental verification of special relativity are in the majority on the planet do, physicists are usually origin for the establishment of a geocentric coordinate and conduct experiments. It is regrettable that so far only confirmed experimental Geocentric stationary coordinate system in the 10-minute walk fast, compared to geocentric coordinate movement bell走得慢experiment only shows the expansion is absolute.

Some physicists assert that the expansion is absolute acceleration is caused by the [6], want to use this to dissolve the special theory of relativity, in theory, in practice, the existence of contradictions. This view is tenable not to be discussed. However, it must be pointed out is that special relativity is described by the expansion of the relativity of time, some physicists would like to use to explain the acceleration of expansion is the absolute nature of time. Even if the absolute acceleration can cause swelling of the time, this is nothing to do with the special theory of relativity, as the special theory of relativity never discussed accelerated movement, special relativity do not think that the expansion is absolute. Expansion of the relativity of time exist in the non-existent? Is there been confirmed by experiment? This is the special theory of relativity could not avoid the question. Accelerated commentators do not want to go to address these problems, but try to turn the topics for discussion from time expansion is not the time for the relative nature of the transfer of absolute expansion is how the formation of this suspicion seems to be substituting one concept, it ascertain the truth for there is no point advantage. Moreover, until now has yet to a mathematical formula, not an example of that acceleration can be extended with a precise clock cycle links to the expansion absolutely attributable to the acceleration of the argument itself can be set up or a question mark, it depends on the acceleration theory to explain the special theory of relativity appeared in doubt neither may not reality.

Although accelerated commentators gushing explained in two inertial system with relative movement between the symmetry of how acceleration is damaged, but the absence of such a symmetry to the establishment of any factual basis. Time expansion, the relative nature of space contraction does not have any effective demonstration experiment is at best reflected by Einstein's rich imagination, it is an indisputable fact. Modern physics is indeed in a dilemma, despite the Lorentz hypothesis but Lorentz Ethernet troubled by the expansion of the absolute nature of time for the experiment has been confirmed by, and the special theory of relativity Although avoid the Ethernet expansion of the troubled but time is the relative nature of the experiment are not always agree. Lorentz hypothesis some problems do exist, but there is no evidence to the contrary on certain special relativity is correct. That enables us out of the special theory of relativity plight of the idea is simply self-deception. A reasonable interpretation of the expansion effect, the need for new exploration. To this end I have pointed out in an article, admitted that in the universe, space superiority local coordinate system exists, which would help the plight of physics from this dilemma to emerge. This writer believes that the coordinate system is superior to the same gravitational linked to the potential field in the superior coordinates movement within the object is static or have a clear meaning. Geostationary superiority in this coordinate system observers will find that within hours swelling movement inertial system, space contraction, and this coordinate system relative to the observer movement static inertial system will be found within the expansive space, shrinking time, the existence of relative movement of two inertial system under normal circumstances does not have symmetry. The author also points out the perspective of experimental verification program [7].

Fourth, special relativity experiments can be used to verify?

Special relativity has been confirmed by experiment? According to the above discussion we can only draw negative conclusions. The next question is the special theory of relativity can be used to verify experimental? In physics circles indeed There is a view that the theory of relativity is not able to be tested in practice. Because身处two inertial system of observers it can never be met, because it involves the reference system to turning, and turning a reference system will acceleration, it is no longer inertial system, and the special theory of relativity applies only inertial system [5]. In all fairness, this passage But it is very consistent with the theory of relativity "retain its original flavor." But people also find it strange, since the two inertial system of observers it can never be met, then the people will only know in what ways the two inertial system of observers will find each other in time expansion space contraction effect? Time expansion, the relative nature of space contraction what is a great man "intuition" or a scientific theory? This deserves special attention.

Concluding remarks

This paper concludes that the special theory of relativity without any experimental basis at all. Anyone can cite a fully consistent with Einstein proposed by the two experiments as a precondition for the counter-examples can be easily negate this conclusion. But so far, such a counter-author also has not been the case.

References

[1] Zhang Yuan Zhong experimental basis in the special theory of relativity Beijing: Science Publishers 1979 [1,64,80,61]

[2] [US] C. Kittel waiting for the translation, such as Mr Bryan Chan dry mechanical Beijing: Science Publishers 1979 [454]

[3] A. Einstein L. Zhao Wei Zhou British Rumsfeld book translated physics evolution Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Publishing House in 1979 [134]

[4] A.P French with David Zhang Translation special relativity Beijing: People's Education Publishing House in 1980 [111]

[5] Guangzheng Ni-chung李洪芳book Modern Physics Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Publishing House in 1979 [64]

[6] Fang Lizhi From Newton's law of the Einstein theory of relativity Beijing: Science Publishers 1981 [49]

[7] Zhu Jidong a time-out problems Paradox Shanghai: Shanghai Electric Institute Journal 2001 Phase III [89]